Many say Web3 lacks new users. But I believe what’s truly missing is a mechanism to identify quality users. Over the past few years, most projects have focused obsessively on growth metrics—wallet counts, trading volumes, community engagement, event attendance… These numbers look impressive, but they’ve also triggered a new problem across the industry: We’ve become better at manipulating data, yet fewer people are genuinely investing in the ecosystem. Once an event ends, the community falls silent. After an airdrop is distributed, very few remain. This isn’t because Web3 has no people—it’s because the reward system has consistently incentivized short-term behavior. So I believe the next critical frontier won’t be which chain has higher TPS or which protocol has greater TVL. It will be who can build a truly credible Reputation System. This is precisely why I’ve been closely following @NucleusCodes. Their goal isn’t to create another task platform. Instead, they aim to gradually build each individual’s digital reputation through on-chain behavior, long-term holdings, content creation, and community engagement. Today you share an insightful analysis. Tomorrow you participate in governance. The day after, you support a new project from its earliest stages. These actions may not yield immediate returns—but they become your accumulated value. When reputation becomes verifiable, resource allocation is no longer just a matter of luck. Those who consistently contribute will more easily earn whitelist access, testnet opportunities, collaborations, and other ecosystem resources. I love this phrase: Your resume doesn’t just exist on LinkedIn—it can exist on-chain. Every transaction, every participation, every piece of content you create could become how others come to know you. Web3 shouldn’t be defined solely by its financial attributes. It must also build a personal credit system for everyone. When more projects begin to trust reputation over short-term metrics, only then will the entire industry truly mature.