The U.S. Senate has moved the CLARITY Act one step closer to a floor debate, filing a motion that sets up an initial procedural vote when lawmakers return from their August recess. Senate Majority Leader John Thune submitted the motion after late-night voting, clearing the way to put the crypto market-structure bill near the top of the Senate’s September agenda. Senators are scheduled to reconvene on Sept. 14. That first vote would decide only whether the Senate should proceed to consider the bill — not whether it becomes law. If the chamber agrees to move forward, senators would still need to debate the measure, consider amendments and hold a final passage vote. Filing the motion now preserves momentum but does not signal that partisan differences have been resolved. Key fault lines remain. Negotiations have stalled over ethics rules for government officials’ crypto holdings, enforcement authority, illicit-finance safeguards and how to treat stablecoin rewards. Democrats want tougher conflict-of-interest provisions and stronger consumer protections. Senator Elizabeth Warren, while supporting federal crypto legislation in principle, has publicly opposed the current CLARITY Act text, citing concerns about corruption risks, consumer safety, national security and financial stability. Stablecoin rewards are one of the biggest sticking points. Banking groups are urging limits on payments for holding stablecoins, arguing such incentives could siphon deposits from traditional banks. Crypto firms counter that broad restrictions would dampen competition and innovation. The compromise under discussion would bar purely passive yield paid solely for holding stablecoins but would permit certain rewards tied to user activity. Industry analysts warn that changes to these rules could have material business effects — for example, Coinbase’s USDC rewards program is estimated to generate roughly $1.35 billion in annual revenue. If enacted, the CLARITY Act would create a federal framework to determine whether particular digital assets fall under the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The House passed an earlier version of the bill by a 294–134 margin in July 2025. The Senate Banking Committee advanced its version 15–9 in May 2026, with Republicans joined by Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks. Still, clearing committee doesn’t guarantee floor success: Thune would likely need 60 votes to invoke cloture and limit debate, requiring support from multiple Democrats. Absent new legislation, U.S. crypto firms will continue operating under the current patchwork of SEC and CFTC oversight, court rulings and state-level rules. Markets have already shown some reaction to the Senate movement: Bitcoin traded near $64,980 on Saturday, up about 0.4% (range roughly $64,507–$65,312), while crypto-related stocks finished the prior session higher — Coinbase closed at $153.60 (+5.7%) and Circle at $66.67 (+5.4%) — though those swings reflected broader market action as well. The next political test arrives in September, when senators must resolve the remaining policy disputes and secure enough bipartisan support to advance the bill beyond the initial procedural vote. For now, the filing signals that leadership intends to make crypto regulation a priority when Congress returns.
U.S. Senate Moves CLARITY Act Toward Floor Vote in September
ChainGPTShare
Summary
The U.S. Senate has filed a motion to bring the CLARITY Act to the floor for a procedural vote in September, following late-night voting by Senate Majority Leader John Thune. The bill, which aims to establish a federal framework for crypto regulation, remains stalled over disagreements on ethics rules, stablecoin rewards, and enforcement authority. If passed, it would determine whether digital assets fall under the SEC or CFTC. The House passed a version of the bill in July 2025, and the Senate Banking Committee advanced it in May 2026. The next key step is securing bipartisan support for a cloture vote, which would require at least 60 votes. The bill’s structure also draws comparisons to MiCA, the EU’s regulatory framework for crypto assets.
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.