Solana Votes to Slow Token Creation, Daily Burn Proposal Trails

iconCoinDesk
Share
AI summary iconSummary
Solana network operators are voting on proposals to reduce SOL supply growth. SGP-0002, which would cut new token listings by 30% annually, passed with 68.77% support. SGP-0003, aiming to boost daily token burns to up to $800,000, has 62.72% backing but lacks the two-thirds threshold. Both proposals target slower supply expansion, benefiting existing holders. The votes mark Solana’s first onchain governance decisions on token launch news and major network changes.

The operators who help run Solana are voting on two ways to reduce the future supply of SOL, its native token. A plan to create fewer new tokens is narrowly passing, while another that would destroy more SOL from transaction fees is falling short.

Solana creates new SOL every day to reward the operators securing the network, so both proposals would slow the growth of the total supply — something that matters to holders because fewer new tokens mean less dilution of the ones they already own.

These votes are part of Solana’s first-ever onchain governance, a system that gives the people running and staking on the network a formal vote on major changes to how Solana works.

One of the proposals would charge transactions according to how much computing work they demand and destroy that portion of the fee entirely, lifting daily burns from roughly 650 SOL to between 7,500 and 9,000.

At prices this week, the upper end is worth about $800,000 a day. CoinDesk previously reported that even 9,000 SOL destroyed each day would remain well below the roughly 60,000 new SOL the network currently creates daily.

Each proposal needs one-third of network stake to participate and two-thirds of participating stake to vote in favor. Abstentions count toward participation, meaning they help meet quorum but do not help a proposal reach the two-thirds approval threshold. All three votes have cleared quorum as of Friday, data from the governance page show.

The so-termed constitution is passing easily. Solana Governance Proposal (SGP)-0001 sets the rules for how major network decisions are put to a vote, including who can participate, how votes are weighted and what support is needed to pass. It has 95.35% support with just 0.22% opposed.

SGP-0002 is over the line, though not by much. It would make Solana reduce the rate at which new SOL is created by 30% each year instead of 15%. The proposal has 68.77% support with 47.72% participation.

That would bring the rate of new token creation down to its minimum of 1.5% a year around 2029 instead of 2032, resulting in roughly 18.9 million fewer SOL being created over six years.

Read more: New Solana vote could ramp daily SOL burns to $800,000 and slow new token creation

SGP-0003, which would change transaction fees and destroy far more SOL, has 62.72% support, with 16.52% opposed and 20.75% abstaining. Participation stands at 42.51%, leaving it below the two-thirds support needed to pass.

Its abstain share is considerably higher than on the other two votes. And because abstentions still count as participating stake, they make it harder for the proposal to reach the approval threshold.

As such, opposition to both supply proposals has been public. Solana Company, the Nasdaq-listed SOL treasury firm trading as HSDT, said on Aug. 21 it backed the constitution but opposed the other two, arguing that institutions need predictable economic rules for multi-year planning.

Voting had earlier been expected to finish around Thursday afternoon UTC but remained open Friday as the final epoch continued. Solana votes run for three epochs, or block-based periods whose exact length varies with network production rather than the clock.

None of the three votes changes the network by itself. An approved SGP is a mandate to proceed, while the detailed technical changes would still have to be written and implemented separately.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.