Over the past 24 hours, Pump.fun generated $1.98 million in protocol revenue, surpassing Hyperliquid’s $1.96 million. While this memecoin launch platform leads in daily metrics, Hyperliquid still holds the top position over the 7-day period.
Key points
- Pump.fun leads in 24-hour revenue comparison.
- Hyperliquid maintains an advantage in the 7-day revenue comparison.
- The probability of YES for the prediction market on Hyperliquid's year-end goal has decreased to 27.5%.
Revenue comparison between Pump.fun and Hyperliquid
Pump.fun’s lead in daily revenue has positioned this Solana-based memecoin launch platform ahead of a major platform focused primarily on decentralized perpetual futures. Pump.fun’s offerings include token creation and fee-generating endpoints, while Hyperliquid operates mainly as a decentralized perpetual futures exchange.
Therefore, this comparison covers two different platform models. Pump.fun's revenue performance indicates strong engagement in memecoin-related activities.
7-day revenue and year-end market pricing
Despite trailing in 24-hour data, Hyperliquid remains ahead in seven-day revenue comparisons. Pump.fun’s daily revenue advantage over Hyperliquid does not extend to longer time periods.
Additionally, market pricing indicates a decline in confidence that Hyperliquid will reach its $100 target by the end of 2026. The probability of a "Yes" outcome on the December 31 prediction market dropped from 36% to 27.5% within 24 hours.
Meme coin participation behind daily results
Pump.fun's revenue performance indicates strong user interest and engagement in the memecoin segment. It leads on a daily basis, contrasting with Hyperliquid, which achieves a higher total revenue over a longer comparison window.
These data reflect different signals: protocol revenue measures platform activity, while prediction market probabilities reflect pricing around a specific year-end outcome. In this market, as of December 31, 2026, the probability of Hyperliquid reaching its $100 target is 27.5%.
This article was generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

