Automated DeFi vaults are great at advertising strategies. The harder part is executing them efficiently when liquidity, collateral and user positions span different environments. That’s where I’d like to see @RomeProtocol used. A programmable portfolio vault with its strategy logic written in Solidity and its underlying liquidity sourced from native Solana protocols. Users could define allocation limits, collateral requirements and rebalancing thresholds without maintaining two versions of the same position. When an allocation moves outside its permitted range, the Solidity strategy executes the required operations through Solana programs. And MetaMask and Phantom users interact with the same vault state. Personally, I find the execution side much more compelling than creating another automated investment dashboard. A rebalance that requires bridging assets before reaching the target liquidity venue introduces additional timing, execution and settlement risks. Direct atomic interaction with supported Solana programs can remove some of that coordination. It doesn’t eliminate slippage, oracle risk or strategy losses. But it changes what developers can build. I’d rather see Rome used to make complex financial strategies easier to execute than simply make existing EVM applications accessible through another wallet. Shared execution becomes considerably more powerful when it changes the actual mechanics of portfolio management.