good morning gRialo! noticed something worth paying attention to in Rialo’s architecture. the choice of RISC-V, specifically RV64EMC, isn't just a technical preference. the team evaluated alternatives like WASM and eBPF before settling on it. why does that matter? RISC-V offers a more predictable execution environment, efficient metering, smaller binaries, and strong sandboxing properties. there's another layer to this decision. its architecture aligns well with zkVMs and proof-carrying computation, which makes it a natural fit for Rialo's longer-term execution model. and with Solana's SVM compatibility, plus planned EVM and MoveVM support, the goal is clearly broader than supporting one developer ecosystem. sometimes the most meaningful decisions in a blockchain aren't visible on the surface. they're buried in the execution layer. that's where this choice starts to make sense.