public campaign rankings are only useful when people can understand where the numbers come from that is one detail i find interesting about the Campaign Board on @zerufinance when a protocol launches a rewards campaign, Clan performance is displayed publicly, with each ranking supported by onchain attribution rather than unexplained leaderboard numbers there is also a useful layer of transparency in the metrics: → Verified Volume shows the attributed trading activity → Wash Trades are filtered out → Clan rankings can be compared through publicly visible data this creates a different kind of competition compared with leaderboards where participants have to trust numbers they cannot independently understand it also makes campaign performance easier to follow and gives Clans a clearer picture of their position but one question remains about how the tracking works over time does onchain attribution update as soon as a trade settles, or is there a processing delay before the volume appears on the public board? and does activity from before a campaign begins carry over, or is the ranking based entirely on campaign period contributions? those details matter when rewards depend on transparent and accurately attributed performance