Let AI work, let humans approve: I endorse this payment boundary. The focus of Ledger Agent Intent is that signing authority remains in human hands. ① On October 15, Ledger introduced Agent Intent: Agents can observe information and propose actions, with users approving them via their Ledger signing device. Subsequently, the Solana Foundation demonstrated the workflow integrated with https://t.co/xzPD3n7IkL. ② The Foundation described the experience as follows: after an Agent initiates a request, it can continue processing tasks, while the user approves via hardware signing when ready. This aims to separate automated execution efficiency from final approval authority. ③ However, hardware signing does not determine whether a transaction is worthwhile. The amount, recipient, authorization scope, and actual transaction details must still be clearly presented before approval. ④ Current materials confirm the product directions and demos announced by both parties; the integration scope, failure handling, and specific supported operations of https://t.co/xzPD3n7IkL remain to be verified by more comprehensive documentation. No signatures or payments were executed in this round. My own assessment: I prefer to view this as a step toward controlled automation. Agents can reduce retrieval and preparatory work, but “efficiency” alone should not grant unlimited spending authority. What I’m most concerned about moving forward is whether users can clearly understand what they are approving—and whether authorization can still be used after it has ended. NFA / DYOR @Solana_zh @solana @Ledger @SolanaFndn