source avatarStarPlatinum

Share

The GTA 6 leaker may have made the biggest mistake possible🚨 - CyberLeek - anonymous individual or group - leaking unreleased GTA VI gameplay - launched $CYBERLEEK on Solana says the money is funding a “secret project” claims this is about fighting anti-consumer practices in gaming But he even introduced paid polls where people use CYBERLEEK to vote on what allegedly gets leaked next Hours ago GTAForums user called Vice Cit started following the money His investigation claims the website, uploads/mirrors and $CYBERLEEK launch can all be connected through wallets funded by the same upstream source Central funding wallet: 3YLNDXnV9fNysDWaD39uQxwxeSaMFeAswvoQPZNvuNA4 $CYBERLEEK creator wallet: Hok9nbV89yBSKCttxe3goqajwbiqQa9mtHvQBsbJH3Np Buffer wallet: Ec2qmcpCCD9hjahAcquiQf5JkZWCK68BUahCje1izYC7 According to Vice Cit: on August 15, the central funding wallet sent 1 SOL to a wallet connected to the website setup minutes later, 0.05 SOL was paid to Turbo shortly after, the first Arweave upload appeared the token creation was funded through an intermediary wallet the creator wallet then reportedly created the liquidity pool with 330 SOL + 730M $CYBERLEEK But believe me this is where it gets interesting Vice Cit claims he traced the funding chain all the way back to KuCoin The route: KuCoin Exchange Wallet → FWbi → J4zo → 26sZ → EjsB → 2ZdU → funding wallet More specifically: KuCoin Exchange Wallet → FWbi: 100.202 SOL FWbi → J4zo: 100.199 SOL J4zo → 26sZ: 156.02 SOL 26sZ → EjsB: 156.02 SOL EjsB → 2ZdU: 10 SOL 2ZdU → wallet allegedly funding the CyberLeek operation EjsB later → 2ZdU: another 146 SOL KuCoin has required identity verification for new users since August 2023 KuCoin has formal guidelines for law-enforcement requests those requests can include transaction hashes, wallet addresses and flow-of-funds information depending on the account and legal process, the exchange could potentially hold relevant account, transaction, session or other metadata Meaning that if Vice Cit’s tracing is correct, CyberLeek may have connected part of the operation to one of the worst possible places for someone trying to remain anonymous A centralized exchange with KYC None of that means he actually has been identified for now But it could be just a matter of time

No.0 picture
No.1 picture
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.