Kelp DAO lost $292M because one key got leaked. This was preventable by privacy project I researched 11 projects that fix this exact problem 1. MPC / Threshold Signatures Key sharded into pieces. No one holds full key. @LitProtocol: MPC + TSS + TEE @FireblocksHQ : institutional-grade MPC custody @Arcium : decentralized MPC on Solana @NEARProtocol Chain Signatures: MPC + EigenLayer security 2. Multi-Validator Verification Multiple independent validators must agree. @chainlink CCIP: Dual DON + Risk Management Network @axelar: PoS consensus + TSS signing @wormhole: Guardian network with 13/19 threshold @hyperlane: Modular Interchain Security Modules 3. ZK-Based Trustless Verification Math proves correctness. No trust assumption needed. @PolyhedraZK /zkBridge: zk-SNARKs verify block headers @SuccinctLabs: ZK light clients @LayerZero_Core zkLightClient: Polyhedra as DVN option Cross-chain security is now the narrative for 2026. After Kelp, protocols no longer choose between "fast and cheap" or "secure." Threshold security is baseline to attract institutional capital. Protocols still running 1-of-1 or low-threshold verification will get phased out.
Share
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.