Have you ever wondered why Nasun ( @Nasun_io ) chose to build its own Layer 1 instead of using existing chains? At first, I thought it was unnecessary… Why not just build on Ethereum, Solana, or Sui like everyone else? But after looking deeper, it starts to make sense. When you build on someone else’s chain, your product can grow… but the value flows to the network you’re built on. Fees, activity, usage, all captured by that ecosystem. Nasun didn’t want that. They’re trying to connect DeFi, AI, and gaming into one loop… So they chose to keep apps + infrastructure + value in the same system. Then there’s the technical side. Products like Pado (derivatives) and Baram (AI governance) need things most chains can’t handle cleanly: Precise execution. Fully on-chain logic. Verifiable AI outcomes. Not patches. Not workarounds. Built into the protocol itself. That’s why they went with a custom L1 using Move,for control, security, and parallel execution. It’s a harder path, slower too. But this isn’t just “build an app”… It’s designing the chain around the product. If it works? That’s when the real network effects kick in gNasun fam