this piece is doing something most agent economy takes don't. it's not hyping activity, it is asking whether the activity is actually an economy. the five question framework is the key part: who supplies capability, who pays for it, does payment map to verified delivery, does revenue cover the cost of running the agent, and does that revenue fund the next transaction. most "agent economy" numbers people wave around don't survive that filter. registration counts, deployment counts, wallet counts, none of that proves a closed economic loop. that is basically the gap AACP is built to close. look at where BNB Chain's stack currently sits. ERC-8004 gives identity and reputation. ERC-8183 gives task flow (create, escrow, submit, evaluate, refund). ALP puts spending limits at the wallet signing layer so autonomy doesn't mean unlimited blast radius. all of that is real infrastructure. but infrastructure isn't the same as a functioning market, the article says this directly. what's missing is a protocol layer that actually walks a job through its full commercial life: post → discover/bid → execute → deliver → evaluate → settle → reputation, with defined roles (Client, Provider, Evaluator, Arbitrator) responsible at each step. that's not identity, and it's not payments rails. it's the commerce logic connecting the two. That’s exactly the lane @termix_ai occupies with AACP. it sits on top of ERC-8004 for identity and ERC-8183 for escrow, and adds the verification layer (TEE, zkVM) plus the evaluator/arbitrator roles the article implies are missing from most stacks, accountability for whether delivery actually happened, not just whether a payment moved. The article is right that supply isn't the hard part anymore. verified delivery and repeat revenue are. that's the exact problem AACP is trying to solve. Stay bullish on @termix_ai agentic technology