Here’s a question worth asking: can institutions use a public blockchain without making sensitive information public? That’s where @primus_labs is an interesting piece of the BNB ecosystem. Institutions often need to prove things like identity, eligibility, compliance or transaction conditions. The problem is that putting the underlying data directly onchain can expose information that should remain private. A better model is prove the fact without revealing everything behind the fact. For example, an institution could potentially prove it satisfies a required condition while keeping the underlying sensitive data confidential. This creates two important properties: Confidentiality: sensitive information stays protected. Verification: the required claim can still be independently checked. For BNB, that combination could make blockchain infrastructure more practical for use cases where privacy and compliance are both required. The real unlock for institutional adoption may not be choosing between privacy and verification. It could be making them work together. To explore more @KaitoStudio_ https://t.co/0ONbH5enCO
MoonguyShare

Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.