Zero-Balance Bug Exposes 82 Provenance Blockchain Assets to Takeover

iconCryptoSlate
Share
AI summary iconSummary
Blockchain news outlets reported that Trail of Bits uncovered a critical Provenance Blockchain flaw impacting 82 live mainnet asset accounts. The bug allowed zero-balance users to gain admin, mint, and withdrawal rights, exposing 74 markers to unauthorized minting. The issue affected around $500,000 in nhash escrow assets. Provenance deployed two blockchain upgrades in May and June 2026 to resolve the issue.

Trail of Bits disclosed a Provenance Blockchain authorization flaw that it said exposed 82 live mainnet asset accounts to takeover. A successful abuse could let someone mint an affected token or withdraw assets held in escrow.

Those special asset accounts, called markers, govern a token's supply, permissions, and escrow balance. The security firm said the flaw allowed a user who held none of a marker's tokens to take its admin, mint, and withdrawal permissions, then act on them in a second transaction.

The bug came from a mismatch between two records of token supply. For non-fixed markers, Provenance's bank module tracks live circulating supply, while the marker's supply field can remain at zero.

The authorization check read the stale marker field when testing whether an account held the entire supply. Because a new account's balance was also zero, the check treated zero as equal to zero and approved the permission change.

Trail of Bits said all 82 affected markers had zero stored supply while carrying real circulating supply or assets in escrow.

The disclosed affected nhash escrow totaled roughly 30 quadrillion nhash, worth about $500,000 at HASH prices when the issue was discovered. Three Provenance Blockchain Foundation programs held most of it: grant0051 held about 19.23 quadrillion nhash, provenance.validator.incentive.program held about 8.56 quadrillion, and grant0077 held about 2.49 quadrillion.

A distinct 74-marker token subset, included within the total of 82, faced unauthorized minting risk. It spanned bridged stablecoins and wrapped assets, consortium deposits, tokenized mortgage participations, and yield tokens.

Named examples included uusd.trading, uusdc.figure.se, nbtc.figure.se, cusd.deposit, cguaranteedrateomni, chomebridgeomni, nuva.ylds, and uylds.fcc.

Related Reading

SEC approves Figures Markets' new yield-bearing stablecoin YLDS

Trail of Bits described a direct inflation risk for unrestricted coin-type markers. Restricted tokens with identity requirements faced supply-integrity and solvency risks even if an attacker could not freely transfer newly created units.

Infographic showing how a zero-balance authorization bug exposed 82 Provenance markers, the affected HASH escrow and token categories, and the two-stage fix timeline.
Infographic showing a zero-balance bug affecting 82 Provenance markers, including 74 in a high-hash subset and roughly $500,000 at discovery.

Trail of Bits said it discovered the flaw in March and reported it to Provenance on April 1. It said a zero-supply guard released with v1.28.0 on May 1 blocked the reported path against all 82 identified markers.

A second change made the authorization check read live supply from the bank module, and the project included it in v1.29.0 on June 8.

GitHub records show the code changes were merged and released. The Trail of Bits disclosure does not say whether chain analysis found unauthorized access, minting, or withdrawals, or whether it notified affected issuers and users.

The post A zero-balance bug let empty wallets seize control of 82 Provenance assets appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.