XRP Ledger and Algorand Compare Quantum Security Progress

iconCoinpaper
Share
AI summary iconSummary
XRP Ledger and Algorand are both advancing blockchain security through quantum-resistant measures. Algorand launched post-quantum accounts in 2026 but still uses non-quantum-resistant cryptography in its consensus. Ripple, working with Project Eleven, is evaluating the XRP Ledger’s validators, custody, and networking for full post-quantum readiness by 2028. Both projects are shaping the future of distributed ledger resilience.

XRPL validator Vet pushed back on claims that Algorand is already fully quantum-ready, noting that quantum-secure accounts are only one layer of the problem. That distinction is important: Algorand has made real progress, but its consensus system still relies partly on cryptography that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could eventually threaten.

Ripple, meanwhile, is working with Project Eleven on a broader system-wide XRPL assessment, including validators, custody, wallets and networking.

Algorand Has a Head Start, but Not a Finished System

Algorand began using Falcon post-quantum signatures in State Proofs in 2022, protecting historical ledger attestations. Native Falcon-based post-quantum accounts then went live on mainnet in August 2026.

But the network is not fully quantum-resistant yet.

Its current Verifiable Random Function, used in consensus committee selection, still relies on elliptic-curve cryptography. Consensus messaging also uses Ed25519, which is not quantum-resistant.

Algorand expects research on a post-quantum VRF in early 2027 and is targeting broad quantum resilience by the end of 2027.

That makes the claim that Algorand is already completely quantum-secure too strong.

Algorand leads on deployment, while XRPL is testing the full stack.

Caption: Algorand leads on deployment, while XRPL is testing the full stack.

XRP Ledger Is Taking a Broader Route

Ripple’s roadmap targets full post-quantum readiness by 2028.

The plan goes beyond wallet signatures. Project Eleven is testing hybrid post-quantum signing, validator performance, Devnet workloads and a quantum-secure custody prototype. Ripple is also examining larger signatures, storage overhead and throughput before moving toward a native amendment.

Project Eleven says the collaboration includes a full audit of XRPL’s validator, custody, networking and wallet layers, followed by working code and real performance data.

That builds on earlier Project Eleven work already covered by Coinpaper.

XRPL also has one structural advantage: native key rotation, allowing users to change signing keys without moving to a new account. Ripple says that could make a future migration easier than on networks where assets must be manually transferred.

We previously found that roughly 300,000 XRPL accounts holding about 2.4 billion XRP had not exposed their public keys, reducing one category of future quantum risk.

The Race Is About More Than Wallets

The bigger takeaway is that “quantum-ready” is not a single switch.

Wallets, validator signatures, consensus, custody and cryptographic primitives all have to migrate.

That is why Algorand can already offer quantum-resistant accounts while still working on consensus, and why XRPL can be behind on native account deployment while simultaneously testing more layers of the network.

XRP traded around $1.43 Thursday, down roughly 1%-2% on the day and more than 50% from a year ago.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.