VanEck Executive: Quantum Risk Not Enough to Warrant Selling Bitcoin

iconBitcoinsistemi
Share
AI summary iconSummary
VanEck’s Matthew Sigel said quantum risk doesn’t justify selling Bitcoin, noting the risk-to-reward ratio remains favorable. He pointed to Bitcoin miners benefiting from long-term energy deals as AI drives power demand. Sigel compared Bitcoin to gold in portfolio positioning and said selling pressure is easing. He emphasized that risk management strategies should focus on Bitcoin’s long-term potential and market share growth.

Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Asset Research at VanEck, stated that Bitcoin could continue to increase its share of the investment market in the long term, but added that quantum computing is not currently a threat close enough to warrant investors selling BTC.

In an interview, Sigel pointed out that the rapid growth in the AI sector has made the electrical infrastructure and long-term energy contracts owned by Bitcoin mining companies more valuable. He noted that in the past, mining companies’ core assets were primarily valued based on computing power and Bitcoin production capacity, but the high and continuous electricity demand of AI data centers is beginning to change this approach.

Sigel noted that some Bitcoin miners have signed 10 to 20-year electricity contracts with counterparties that have investment-grade credit ratings, adding that these agreements offer companies additional value that isn’t solely tied to the Bitcoin price. He stated that with the growth of the AI sector, affordable and stable electricity sources may become increasingly scarce, and mining companies with long-term energy access could capitalize on new business opportunities, such as transforming their facilities into AI and high-performance computing infrastructure.

Sigel, also commenting on the Bitcoin market, added that there are signs that the selling pressure is beginning to weaken.

Sigel also compared Bitcoin and gold in terms of their positions in investment portfolios, arguing that Bitcoin could achieve a larger market share over time. Stating that VanEck maintains its positive view on Bitcoin’s long-term adoption trend, Sigel noted that Bitcoin reaching a fraction of the market capitalization of other major investment assets could be a significant benchmark in its future valuation.

Sigel also touched upon the potential impact of quantum computing on the Bitcoin network, saying that the technology poses a risk to be monitored in the long term, but at the current stage it is not at a level that would warrant selling for Bitcoin investors.

*This is not investment advice.

Continue Reading: VanEck Executive: “Quantum Risk Isn’t Significant Enough to Warrant Selling Bitcoin” — Compared It to Gold

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.