U.S. Judge Dismisses Defamation Lawsuit Filed by XRP Blogger Jake Claver

icon币界网
Share
AI summary iconSummary
A U.S. federal judge in Washington State dismissed defamation lawsuit filed by XRP blogger Jake Claver against content creator Zach Rector. The case centered on three 2025 videos, which the court found to contain no actionable false statements. Invoking Washington’s anti-SLAPP law, the judge ruled in favor of free expression, rejecting claims of defamation, conspiracy, and breach of contract. The dismissal was without prejudice, allowing Claver to amend the complaint by September 23. Rector may seek reimbursement of legal costs. Risk-on assets remain sensitive to regulatory developments, while CFT measures continue to shape market narratives.
CoinDesk reports:

A federal judge in Washington State, USA, dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by XRP-related blogger Jake Claver against content creator Zach Rector. The case centered on three videos posted by Rector in 2025, which the court found did not contain false statements constituting defamation.

The case revolves around three videos.

Reports indicate that the controversy centers on Rector’s content targeting Digital Ascension Group and Digital Wealth Partners, both under Claver. The videos in question allege misconduct by the two companies.

Court documents show that these videos rely in part on materials from another lawsuit in New York, filed by payment processing company Verivend Inc. The documents state that Claver admitted in that case to forging emails, wire transfer confirmations, and a screenshot of a “Verivend wallet dashboard” showing a balance of over $1 million.

The court invoked anti-SLAPP laws.

Chief Judge Kymberly K. Evanson granted Rector’s motion under Washington State’s Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, a law commonly regarded as an anti-SLAPP mechanism designed to protect speech on matters of public concern.

The court also dismissed all of Claver’s claims, including allegations of defamation, tortious interference, conspiracy, and breach of contract. The ruling was “without prejudice,” meaning the plaintiff may amend and refile the case.

According to the ruling, Rector is also entitled to recover attorney fees and litigation costs. Claver may file an amended complaint by September 23.

The XRP community has shown a strong reaction.

Rector subsequently confirmed the ruling, stating that the court found no actionable false statements in his video. He also said that this lawsuit targets his right to free speech on matters of public concern.

After the ruling was announced, the XRP community responded strongly on social media. Some users viewed the outcome as support for Rector’s content, while others believed the case sent a clear message that defamation lawsuits should not be used to suppress criticism within the cryptocurrency community.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.