Three Crypto Bridges Lose $35M in Six-Hour Attack Spree

iconNS3
Share
AI summary iconSummary
On-chain news reports that three crypto bridges lost over $35 million in a six-hour attack wave. The Verus-Ethereum bridge, B2 Network, and other protocols were hit due to logic flaws and stolen keys. BlockAid noted the Verus bridge reused a contract path from a prior $11.5 million exploit. PeckShield and BlockAid confirmed no cryptographic failures were involved. Crypto news outlets highlight the risks in cross-chain systems.

Key Point

At least three crypto bridges and cross-chain protocols were drained of more than $35 million in a six-hour span. BlockAid detected a Verus-Ethereum bridge exploit that drained about $7.54 million in ether, tokenized bitcoin, and stablecoins. BlockAid said the Verus attack reused the same bridge contract and entry path as an earlier May hack that caused an $11.5 million loss. The B2 Network lost roughly $3.86 million after an attacker seized its staking contract’s upgrade authority. BlockAid and PeckShield reported that the attacks involved logic flaws or compromised keys rather than broken cryptography.

Why it matters: Bridge security failures may reduce confidence in cross-chain liquidity because users rely on these systems to move assets between networks.

Market Sentiment

Bearish, Stress-on, Tech-driven, De-risking.

Reason: At least three bridges and cross-chain protocols lost more than $35 million in six hours, which points to acute infrastructure risk.

Similar Past Cases

The Ronin Bridge hack drained $625 million and became a major reference point for bridge security failures in crypto. Ronin later moved toward an Ethereum Layer 2 migration four years after the attack. (The Block) Difference: The current incident involves several smaller protocol drains within hours rather than one dominant bridge failure.

Ripple Effect

Bridge exploits can reduce trust in cross-chain liquidity because users may avoid systems that depend on upgrade keys or vulnerable import paths. If affected bridges halt or restrict transfers, then liquidity could fragment across connected networks. If the same bug class appears again, then security reviews may become the main signal for whether the damage remains contained.

Opportunities & Risks

Opportunities: If affected protocols publish fixes and access-control reviews, then waiting for those updates before adding bridge exposure can reduce smart-contract and key-management risk.

Risks: If additional bridge reserves are drained or the same bug class appears again, then reducing exposure to affected bridge liquidity can limit downside from repeat attacks.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.