Tech Giants Face Class Action Lawsuits Over AI Voice Training

iconCryptoBriefing
Share
AI summary iconSummary
A class action lawsuit targeting Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and others claims these firms used voice data without consent to train AI models, violating Illinois’ BIPA. Plaintiffs say the companies failed to disclose collection, get permission, or follow data retention rules. Defendants argue there is no concrete harm shown. The legal battle comes amid rising scrutiny on data privacy and regulatory actions in liquidity and crypto markets. Authorities are also monitoring how such practices might intersect with CFT (Countering the Financing of Terrorism) regulations.

A group of Illinois-based journalists, podcasters, voice actors, and audiobook narrators has taken nine of the world’s most powerful technology companies to court, alleging their voices were scooped up and fed into AI systems without permission. The lawsuits, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois between May 13 and 19, 2026, name Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, Samsung, Alphabet, Adobe, and ElevenLabs as defendants.

What the lawsuits actually claim

The legal complaints rest primarily on Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, commonly called BIPA. Before a company can collect a biometric identifier, including a voiceprint, it has to tell you, get your sign-off, and follow strict rules about how long it keeps the data.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs argue that none of the named companies did any of that. Their recorded voices, produced professionally for podcasts, audiobooks, and journalism, were allegedly harvested and used to train AI voice models without disclosure, without consent forms, and without the retention limits BIPA requires.

The suits also invoke state right-of-publicity laws and consumer fraud statutes. Statutory damages under BIPA can reach $1,000 per violation for negligent breaches and $5,000 per violation for intentional ones, calculated per victim and per subsection of the law.

Who’s fighting whom

The plaintiffs are represented by Loevy & Loevy, a Chicago-based firm that secured a $75 million BIPA settlement in 2024. On the other side, Gibson Dunn and Morgan Lewis are among the major law firms representing the tech companies.

As of late August 2026, the defendants have filed motions to dismiss, arguing the plaintiffs have not presented concrete evidence of actual harm. The plaintiffs counter that the systematic harvesting of voice data is itself the harm BIPA was designed to prevent, regardless of whether a cloned voice showed up in a commercial product that the original speaker could identify.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.