Study Reveals 35% of New Webpages Are AI-Generated by Mid-2025

iconCryptoBriefing
Share
AI summary iconSummary
A recent peer-reviewed study tracked via on-chain data reveals 35% of new webpages by mid-2025 are AI-generated or AI-assisted. Over 20% show no signs of human editing. Researchers from Imperial College London, Stanford, and the Internet Archive used the Pangram v3 detector to analyze a stratified sample of websites. AI content shows 33% higher semantic similarity and 107% stronger positive sentiment than human-written content. Factual errors, outbound links, and semantic density remain unaffected. A survey of 853 US adults showed a perception gap. Researchers suggested cryptographic verification of human authorship. Traders tracking altcoins to watch may find these findings relevant.

The web is being rewritten, quite literally, by machines. A peer-reviewed study from researchers at Imperial College London, Stanford University, and the Internet Archive found that roughly 35% of newly published websites by mid-2025 can be classified as AI-generated or AI-assisted. More than 20% are fully AI-generated, with no meaningful human editing detected.

That figure was effectively zero before ChatGPT’s public launch in late November 2022. In about two and a half years, AI went from writing none of the web to writing more than a third of its new pages.

Advertisement

What the data actually shows

The research team, led by Jonas Dolezal, Sawood Alam, Mark Graham, and Maty Bohacek, analyzed a stratified sample of websites archived through the Wayback Machine from mid-2022 to mid-2025. They used the Pangram v3 detector to classify content, scanning for linguistic patterns characteristic of large language model output.

Two findings stood out. AI-generated sites showed a 33% increase in semantic similarity compared to human-written pages. The second notable result: positive sentiment scores on AI-generated pages were 107% higher than on human-written ones.

But the study also pushed back against several popular fears. Four commonly cited concerns about AI content, including increased factual inaccuracies, fewer outbound links, less stylistic variety, and lower semantic density in longer texts, showed no statistically significant correlation with AI prevalence.

The perception gap

The researchers surveyed 853 US adults about their beliefs regarding AI-generated content online. A majority believed in all six negative impacts they were asked about, including the four that the quantitative analysis couldn’t substantiate.

Why verification infrastructure matters

The researchers described this transformation as one of the most significant shifts in the history of the web. Their recommendations pointed toward two specific interventions: cryptographic verification of human authorship and algorithmic changes that prioritize diverse, human-generated content.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.