A new Solana DEX design has reignited a debate about whose blockchain solved decentralized exchange problems first — and an ex-Ripple developer says the answer goes back more than a decade. What sparked it - At Solana Summit Germany, Thomas Gehrmann unveiled Mato, a Solana-based DEX that uses a continuous clearing auction to combat front-running and order-sequencing games. - Crypto commentator Crypto Goblin highlighted Mato’s core idea: instead of matching orders one-by-one, Mato streams orders across a user-set time window and clears demand and supply in parallel at a dynamically updating market price. The aim is fairness — no single actor controls sequencing and no taker gets priority. The Ripple response - Former Ripple developer Matt Hamilton pushed back, arguing that the XRP Ledger (XRPL) solved these market-structure problems years ago. “This problem was solved 15 years ago on the XRP Ledger,” he wrote, calling XRPL “the very first DEX in existence.” - Hamilton added that while he welcomed Solana’s work, he worries the industry keeps re-inventing the same ideas instead of building on earlier designs. Why XRPL is part of the discussion - The XRP Ledger launched in 2012 with a built-in, central limit order book DEX that lets users trade XRP and issued tokens natively on the ledger — long before DeFi became a mainstream term. - XRPL’s exchange functionality is integrated into the protocol itself rather than implemented solely via smart contracts. Documentation says the ledger supports order-book trading, AMMs, or a combination, depending on liquidity. - Ripple and XRPL proponents point to continuous operation since 2012 as evidence that the network was an early DeFi/DEX pioneer. XRPL is still evolving - XRPL isn’t standing still: the XRPL Foundation has proposed “AMM Swappable Curves” to add StableSwap-style curves and concentrated liquidity to the native AMM. - The ledger is also voting on XLS-65 and XLS-66, amendments that would introduce native vaults and fixed-rate lending — enabling pooled asset vaults and fixed-term loans without relying on external smart contracts. - On the enterprise side, Ripple and Bitso recently launched MXNB, a Mexican peso stablecoin on XRPL tied into Ripple’s Payments on DEX rails for regulated settlement. Not identical solutions - Mato’s continuous clearing auction and XRPL’s long-running native order book are different technical approaches. Mato emphasizes parallel processing within a timed auction window; XRPL built order book mechanics into the ledger from the start and later added AMM tooling. - Still, the exchange of comments underscores how older blockchain architectures are resurfacing in modern debates about fairness, front-running and market design. Bottom line As Solana builders experiment with new DEX primitives, proponents of older platforms like XRPL are reminding the market that some solutions — particularly around order sequencing and on-ledger exchange primitives — have been explored before. Mato and XRPL offer different implementations toward the same goal: fairer on-chain trading.
Solana's Mato DEX Sparks Debate Over DEX Innovation, XRPL Cited as Early Pioneer
ChainGPTShare
A new Solana-based DEX called Mato, launched at Solana Summit Germany, has sparked a debate over blockchain innovation in decentralized trading. Ex-Ripple developer Matt Hamilton claims the XRP Ledger solved DEX challenges 15 years ago. Mato uses a continuous clearing auction to prevent front-running, while XRPL features a native order book and proposed AMM upgrades. Both aim to improve on-chain news and trading fairness through different technical methods.
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.
