SEC Clarifies Governance Tokens Are Not Securities If Decentralized

iconBeInCrypto
Share
AI summary iconSummary
SEC news on November 2 clarified that governance tokens like Uniswap (UNI) are not securities if the network is truly decentralized. The guidance addresses concerns about collective voting by token holders forming a controlling group. SEC staff said independent voting in a decentralized system does not create a controlling group if power is widely distributed. Projects must prove decentralization, and the guidance is nonbinding. The update could help DeFi projects and investors facing regulatory uncertainty. A network upgrade in governance structure may now be seen as a step toward compliance.

The SEC has clarified an important question for governance cryptocurrencies like Uniswap (UNI): Does giving thousands of investors voting power make a token a security?

SEC staff now says generally no, provided the network is genuinely decentralized. The clarification could remove a major regulatory concern for decentralized finance (DeFi) projects and their investors.

What Has the SEC Changed?

In its November 2 update, SEC staff explained how governance tokens fit into the agency’s March crypto framework.

Governance tokens let holders vote on how a crypto project operates. For example, UNI holders can vote on changes to Uniswap, including how the protocol spends its funds.

Previously, there was uncertainty over whether thousands of people voting together could be considered one controlling group.

That matters because a cryptocurrency operating without central control may qualify as a digital commodity rather than a security, potentially facing different regulatory requirements.

The SEC staff clarified that independent holders voting through a decentralized system generally do not count as a controlling group.

However, projects must demonstrate that voting power is widely distributed. If a company or small group can independently change network rules, restrict access or override decisions, that could still indicate central control.

What Does This Mean for UNI and Other Crypto Traders?

For investors, the clarification reduces one source of uncertainty surrounding governance tokens.

It could make exchanges and institutional investors more comfortable dealing with qualifying tokens over time. However, it does not automatically classify UNI or every governance token as a commodity.

Uniswap is particularly relevant because its community voted on adopting a Wyoming DUNA, a legal structure designed for decentralized organizations.

There is one important catch. This is nonbinding SEC staff guidance, not a new law. Future regulators could interpret the issue differently.

Congress could provide stronger certainty through the CLARITY Act, which failed to advance in September. Tuesday’s midterm elections will determine the next Congress responsible for revisiting i

The post SEC Just Made Regulation Easier For Governance Tokens Like Uniswap appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.