Samson Mow stated that BIP-110 cannot be compared to BIP-148. BIP-148 had support from developers, exchanges, wallets, miners, and large holders, with economic weight, hashing power, and node support; BIP-110 currently has support primarily from some nodes. SegWit was adopted by miners through BIP-91, while BIP-148 created a credible threat without undergoing a chain split. Michael Saylor shared this post.
Samson Mow Highlights Key Differences Between BIP-110 and BIP-148
AiCoinShare
Summary
Samson Mow highlighted the key differences between BIP-110 and BIP-148, noting that BIP-148 enjoys broad support from developers, exchanges, wallets, miners, and major holders, including full node and hash power backing. In contrast, BIP-110 lacks widespread node decentralization and has only partial node support. SegWit was advanced by BIP-91 to incentivize miners to adopt BIP-141, while BIP-148 created a credible threat without causing a chain split. Michael Saylor shared the post.
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.