Robinhood Responds to AMC's Criticism on Tokenized Stocks

icon币界网
Share
AI summary iconSummary
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev addressed AMC’s concerns regarding tokenized stocks, stating that companies cannot control external financial products linked to their shares. AMC’s Adam Aron criticized the move, saying it undermines shareholder relationships and raises legal questions. Tokenized assets do not equate to direct ownership, fueling debates in liquidity and crypto markets. The discussion reflects broader uncertainty surrounding risk-on assets and how tokenization impacts traditional equity structures.
CoinDesk reports:

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev responded to the controversy over tokenized stocks, stating that once a company has gone public, it cannot control whether other institutions develop financial products around its stock. This statement comes as tensions escalate between AMC and Robinhood over stock tokenization.

Dispute centers on issuer authority

Tenev stated that publicly traded companies can determine the rights and obligations associated with their issued shares, but this does not mean they can control all external products related to those shares. According to him, companies cannot prevent other firms from issuing securities that "reference these stocks."

Tenev also stated that whether issuer consent is required depends on the specific product structure. If the relevant product is issued by an independent entity and backed by underlying shares, such tokenized securities should not be presumed to require approval from the listed company.

AMC publicly opposes the related arrangements

This response follows criticism from AMC CEO Adam Aron, who argued that Robinhood’s tokenized stocks undermine the traditional relationship between publicly traded companies and their shareholders, sparking broader market discussions about shareholder rights and ownership identity.

Holding coins does not equal direct ownership of shares.

Tokenization typically refers to issuing digital representations of real-world assets or securities on a blockchain network. The report notes that holding such tokenized assets does not mean the holder directly owns the underlying asset itself.

This means that the rights associated with the relevant products still depend on the issuance structure and the correspondence between the tokens and the underlying shares. The dispute has once again brought the legal status of tokenized securities into the spotlight of the market.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.