ChainCatcher report: On August 3, OpenAI issued a public statement formally responding to Apple’s prior lawsuit. OpenAI described Apple’s lawsuit as “careless, aggressive, and personal,” highlighting multiple factual inaccuracies: Apple’s external counsel mistakenly sent an email intended for another party to OpenAI’s legal head, falsely claiming the two companies had spoken by phone; Apple later admitted this was due to “confusing two Asian surnames.” OpenAI also disclosed that after initial contact in February, Apple stated it was “resolving any issues,” but then remained silent for five months until filing the lawsuit. Regarding the allegation that former Apple employee Chang Liu took confidential information, OpenAI presented iMessage records showing that after Liu’s departure, Apple colleagues proactively reached out to him requesting assistance locating files, acknowledging this as a common issue resulting from Apple’s poor management of post-employment access permissions. Another named executive, Tang Tan, who worked at Apple for over 24 years, is cited by OpenAI as having consistently instructed his team to “never use any confidential information from other companies.” OpenAI stated it proactively offered to cooperate in resolving the matter, but Apple chose to file suit, calling Apple’s request for a preliminary injunction “based on false information and entirely unnecessary.” Previously, in July, Apple sued OpenAI, alleging it poached Apple employees and used confidential information to develop AI products.
OpenAI Responds to Apple Lawsuit, Calls It 'Negligent and Aggressive'
ChaincatcherShare
On August 3, OpenAI responded to Apple’s lawsuit, calling it “negligent and aggressive.” The company pointed out factual inaccuracies, including a misdirected email and confusion surrounding Asian surnames. OpenAI noted Apple’s silence following its February claims of resolving the issues and shared iMessage records demonstrating Apple’s inadequate access controls. The company also referenced Tang Tan’s instructions prohibiting the use of confidential data. OpenAI stated it had offered to resolve the matter, but Apple proceeded with legal action. The case involves allegations of employee poaching and data misuse. Amid regulatory scrutiny such as MiCA (EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation), such disputes could impact liquidity and crypto markets.
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.