OpenAI Responds to Apple Lawsuit, Calls It 'Careless and Aggressive'

icon MarsBit
Share
AI summary iconSummary
On August 3, OpenAI responded to Apple’s lawsuit, calling it “careless and aggressive.” The company highlighted factual inaccuracies, including a misdirected email from Apple’s lawyer falsely asserting a prior conversation. Apple later admitted to confusing two surnames. OpenAI noted that Apple had stated in February it was “resolving any issues,” yet took no action for five months. Regarding employee Chang Liu, OpenAI shared iMessage records showing Apple colleagues reached out to him due to poor access management. Another executive, Tang Tan, was reportedly explicit in instructing his team not to use confidential data. OpenAI offered to settle the matter, but Apple proceeded with legal action, which OpenAI described as “based on false information.” The case involves allegations of employee poaching and misuse of confidential data. Amid ongoing regulatory scrutiny, the CFT (Countering the Financing of Terrorism) framework continues to influence liquidity and crypto markets.

Huo Xing Finance reports that on August 3, OpenAI issued a public statement formally responding to Apple’s prior lawsuit. OpenAI described Apple’s lawsuit as “careless, aggressive, and personal,” highlighting multiple factual inaccuracies: Apple’s external counsel mistakenly sent an email intended for another party to OpenAI’s legal head, falsely claiming the two companies had spoken by phone; Apple later admitted this was due to “confusing two Asian surnames.” OpenAI also disclosed that after initial contact in February, Apple stated it was “resolving any issues,” yet remained silent for five months before filing the lawsuit. Regarding the allegation that former Apple employee Chang Liu took confidential information, OpenAI presented iMessage records showing that after his departure, Apple colleagues proactively reached out to him requesting assistance locating files, acknowledging this as a common issue resulting from Apple’s poor management of post-employment access permissions. Another named executive, Tang Tan, who worked at Apple for over 24 years, is cited by OpenAI as having consistently instructed his team to “never use any confidential information from other companies.” OpenAI stated it proactively offered to cooperate in resolving the matter, but Apple chose to file suit, calling its requested preliminary injunction “based on false information and entirely unnecessary.” Previously, in July, Apple sued OpenAI, accusing it of poaching Apple employees and using confidential information to develop AI products.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.