NEAR Governance Approves Plan to Cut Token Issuance Cap to 1.6%

iconThe Defiant
Share
AI summary iconSummary
NEAR token launch news: Governance approved a plan to cut annual issuance from 2.5% to 1.6% over 24 months. The HSP-029 ballot closed Nov. 2 with 3.29 million veNEAR in favor. The change needs Security Council review, a 90-day grace period, and a protocol upgrade. Stakers’ yield may fall from 5.27% to 3.37%, and validator revenue could drop 36%. The proposal keeps 90% for staking rewards and 10% for the treasury, with no new spending. Validator adoption is optional, and quarterly reports will track progress. New token listings remain unaffected by the adjustment.

NEAR’s House of Stake governance body has approved a plan to lower the token’s maximum annual issuance from 2.5% to 1.6% over 24 months, reducing dilution for holders while cutting the rewards paid to stakers and validator operators.

The HSP-029 ballot closed Nov. 2. House of Stake’s public voting records show approximately 3.29 million veNEAR of voting power in favor, about 1,071 abstaining and less than 0.00002 against. Its voter record lists 36 voting accounts. Approval does not change emissions immediately: Security Council review and ratification, a roughly 90-day grace period and separate validator adoption of a protocol upgrade are still required.

For stakers, the proposal models gross annual yield falling from about 5.27% to 3.37% at the target issuance rate, assuming the staking participation measured in its Sept. 22 snapshot stays unchanged at 42.71% of supply. Validator commission revenue would fall roughly 36% under unchanged staking and fee assumptions. Holders who do not stake would face less dilution without losing staking income.

“Validators adopt the change through a protocol upgrade, which makes it binding,” NEAR Protocol said in its announcement.

https://x.com/i/status/2117338455189385533

Lower Rewards, Separate Validator Consent

The proposal, authored by SVRN CEO Sal Ternullo, retains the existing allocation described in the document as 90% to staking participants and 10% to the treasury. It creates no new spending program or validator subsidy.

Once activated, the maximum issuance rate would decline each epoch—a recurring network operating interval—rather than fall in a single cut. The schedule reaches 1.6% at month 24. The grace period after ratification is intended to give wallets, exchanges, custodians and staking providers time to update disclosures.

The lower reward figures are projections, not promised yields. If the share of supply staked falls, the remaining stakers divide the reward allocation among less stake, raising their yield relative to the fixed-participation model.

The proposal also acknowledges pressure on smaller operators. Its model estimates that 24 of 405 pools would lose the ability to cover machine costs from commission and owner-staking income at the target rate, using a $4.30 NEAR price and monthly cost assumptions of $500 for block producers and $200 for standard nodes. That is a modeled loss of self-sufficiency, not a forecast that those validators will shut down.

Validator operators retain a separate decision over implementation. The proposal explicitly says House of Stake cannot bind them; adoption through the standard protocol upgrade process is required. Its implementation plan calls for quarterly reports comparing realized issuance with the schedule and tracking validator-set health.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.