Hackers Drain $2.73M from 737 Polymarket Accounts in One Hour

iconCoinpaper
Share
AI summary iconSummary
Hackers drained $2.73 million from 737 Polymarket accounts in one hour on October 29, according to on-chain news from CoinPaper. Attackers used valid wallet approvals to make 985 withdrawals via the platform’s transaction relayer. Funds were converted to Polygon’s POL token and moved across multiple wallets. Polymarket announced $3.9 million in refunds and compensation. The incident highlights risks around wallet approvals and comes amid new token listings gaining traction on the platform.

Key takeaways

  • Hackers drained 737 Polymarket accounts of $2.73 million
  • Valid wallet approvals enabled withdrawals without breaking smart contracts
  • Polymarket announced $3.9 million in refunds and compensation

A coordinated attack on Polymarket drained approximately $2.73 million from 737 user accounts within a single hour on October 29, according to a new blockchain investigation that traced nearly 1,000 unauthorized withdrawals through the prediction market's own infrastructure.

The Bitquery investigation found that attackers executed 985 withdrawals between 17:10 and 18:10 UTC, using valid wallet approvals rather than exploiting a smart-contract vulnerability. The funds were converted into Polygon's POL token and distributed across multiple wallets before some were moved toward Ethereum.

How Hackers Drained 737 Polymarket Accounts

Bitquery identified a series of automated withdrawals routed through Polymarket's official transaction relayer, which submits user-authorized blockchain transactions without requiring traders to pay network fees directly.

The approvals appeared legitimate to the underlying smart wallets. In a sample of 30 withdrawals, researchers found that transactions were executed just three to seven seconds after their approvals were generated, suggesting automated activity.

The largest individual account loss reached approximately $358,000, while four accounts represented 43% of the total stolen funds. Meanwhile, 276 accounts lost less than $100 each.

The attack resembles a June security breach that resulted in approximately $2.94 million in losses across at least 11 wallets. That incident also involved malicious code introduced through a compromised third-party dependency.

Polymarket previously experienced account breaches linked to an external authentication provider, illustrating how services connected to a platform can become targets even when its underlying blockchain contracts remain intact.

Investigators Trace Stolen Funds Across Polygon and Ethereum

Researchers identified an attacker-controlled address that received approximately 28.64 million POL before the tokens were distributed across three newly created wallets.

Some funds subsequently moved toward Ethereum through Relay, deBridge and Polygon's native bridge. At the investigation's 19:49 UTC cutoff, approximately $2.17 million remained in three Polygon wallets, while another identified Ethereum wallet held 126.10 ETH.

The attacker also transferred prediction-market positions from 33 accounts and created a new Polymarket account to sell some of the stolen shares.

One unusual finding concerned Polymarket's response. Bitquery identified another $10.99 withdrawal at 19:11 UTC, approximately 38 minutes after the company said it had fixed the problem.

That transaction does not establish that the vulnerability remained generally exploitable, but it raises questions about the timing of the remediation.

Polymarket Announces $3.9 Million in Reimbursements

Polymarket's official incident report confirmed that an attacker replaced a third-party website script with malicious code targeting users who had the platform open.

The company removed the script, cleared caches, reset active sessions and temporarily suspended trading. It subsequently reported that 95% of affected wallets had been fully refunded and that total reimbursements would reach $3.9 million.

The breach adds another security concern for a prediction-market sector already facing scrutiny over market integrity and the handling of sensitive trading information.

It also illustrates a wider risk for decentralized financial applications: even when blockchain contracts function correctly, compromised external software can still authorize damaging transactions. Previous security concerns surrounding Polymarket have highlighted how important it is to distinguish genuine infrastructure compromises from other reported threats.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.