Chinese victims in the Qian Zhimin case may only recover principal and interest.

iconKuCoinFlash
Share
AI summary iconSummary
On October 13, 2026, a UK High Court ruled that Chinese investors in the Qian Zhimin case must rely on Chinese law to claim their share of over 61,000 bitcoins. Approximately 16,000 victims may recover only their principal and interest, forfeiting gains from bitcoin’s 200-fold price increase. The UK Director of Public Prosecutions supported the application of Chinese law, while investors advocated for UK law. MiCA (EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) may later influence similar cross-border crypto disputes. Liquidity and crypto markets remain sensitive to legal rulings in major jurisdictions.

BlockBeats news, on October 13, according to Caixin, the UK court issued a significant ruling regarding the cross-border asset recovery dispute involving over 61,000 bitcoins linked to the illegal fundraising case of Tianjin Lan Tian Ge Rui in China. On October 12 local time, the judgment document obtained by Caixin from the UK High Court showed that the UK High Court determined that Chinese investors' property rights claims regarding the involved bitcoins should be assessed under Chinese law, not UK law.


This means that approximately 16,000 Chinese victims who participated in the UK claims process may not be able to share in the substantial gains from Bitcoin’s price surge under UK law, and can recover at most only their principal and interest.


Qian Zhimin purchased Bitcoin on Huobi in 2014 at an average price of approximately RMB 2,815. Since then, the price of Bitcoin has risen significantly. Despite multiple rounds of sharp fluctuations, as of October 12, 2026, the price of Bitcoin was around RMB 560,000—roughly 200 times the average price he paid back then.


During the hearings held from July 7 to 9 this year, the Director of Public Prosecutions of the United Kingdom argued for the application of Chinese law; the receiver for Tianjin Blue Sky Ge Rui Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. supported this position, while the lawyers representing Chinese individual investors advocated for the application of British law, or alternatively, both Chinese and British laws. The court ultimately sided with the position of the UK prosecution.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.