Chinese regulator fines individual 485,000 RMB for AI-generated false articles on soda ash production

icon MarsBit
Share
AI summary iconSummary
Regulatory enforcement in China intensified as the Sichuan Securities Regulatory Bureau fined individual investor Sun Zheyuan 485,000 RMB for creating and publishing 17 AI-generated false articles on soda ash production. The articles, posted on Baidu Baijia Hao, falsely reported a company’s boiler failure and claimed factory damage from an Alashan earthquake. Sun profited 85,028.85 RMB from trading soda ash futures during the period of dissemination. The regulator confiscated all profits and imposed an additional 400,000 RMB fine. Sun argued the articles had no real impact and cited mental health issues, but the regulator rejected both claims. The case underscores the risks of manipulating risk-on assets through misinformation.

According to monitoring by Beating, the Sichuan Securities Regulatory Bureau imposed a penalty on individual investor Sun Zheyuan. He used AI to generate 17 fabricated articles about soda ash production and published them on Baidu’s Baijiahao under the account “Di Kan.” During the dissemination period, he traded soda ash futures and, after deducting transaction fees, gained 85,028.85 yuan. Regulators confiscated all profits and imposed a fine of 400,000 yuan, totaling approximately 485,000 yuan in penalties and forfeitures. These 17 articles revolved around two false claims: four claimed that a soda ash company experienced a boiler malfunction, halting production for at least six months; the other 13 claimed that an earthquake in Alashan damaged factories. One day after publication, the articles collectively received 8,794 views. Some investors had already verified the claims with the listed companies, and others reported the misinformation to regulatory platforms. Sun Zheyuan argued that the articles caused no substantial impact and that his futures profits were unrelated to the false information. He also claimed to have a long-standing mental illness. The Sichuan Securities Regulatory Bureau rejected all arguments, determining that his intent was clearly deliberate and that he failed to prove he was unable to recognize or control his actions at the time of the incident. The regulator further clarified that profits from futures trading during the dissemination of false information may be directly classified as illegal gains.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.