Headline: CFTC tells regulated prediction markets to stop using sportsbook-style odds as states push back The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has warned regulated prediction markets not to display American-style gambling odds — the +150 / −200 format familiar from sportsbooks — as state regulators intensify efforts to treat sports-linked event contracts as unlicensed betting, Bloomberg reported on Aug. 7. Why it matters - Prediction markets typically price contracts between $0 and $1 to reflect an implied probability. The CFTC says using sportsbook-style American odds risks making regulated exchanges look indistinguishable from conventional gambling platforms. - The agency reminded registered entities that event contracts remain subject to U.S. derivatives laws and warned against “deceptive” listing, advertising, or solicitation practices. The guidance implies federal registration does not give prediction markets license to market themselves like sportsbooks. Regulatory tug-of-war The warning lands amid a broader jurisdictional fight between the CFTC and state gaming regulators. The CFTC asserts that designated contract markets fall under its exclusive authority via the Commodity Exchange Act, while state officials say contracts tied to sporting events are wagers that require local gambling licenses. High-profile litigation - New York escalated the conflict on July 31 when Attorney General Letitia James sued Kalshi, seeking at least $36 billion in damages and penalties. The complaint alleges Kalshi operates an unlicensed gambling business by allowing New York residents to trade contracts on sports and other events; Kalshi says its CFTC-regulated status places it outside state gambling oversight. - Attorneys general from 44 states have urged the CFTC to withdraw and rewrite its proposed prediction market rules, arguing that states have traditionally regulated sports betting. - Federal courts have been split: a Wisconsin federal court rejected the CFTC’s effort to block states from applying gambling laws to prediction platforms, and Washington secured a preliminary injunction in July allowing the state to enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi. - In Utah, a federal court ruled the state could enforce its anti-gambling laws against prediction markets; Kalshi filed an emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal, concerned that Utah’s attorney general could pursue civil or criminal charges during the appeal, according to gaming-law expert Daniel Wallach. Kalshi plans to take the matter to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Utah residents were still able to access the platform immediately after the decision, but the state has signaled it intends to enforce its laws. Enforcement and compliance implications The CFTC has not limited its scrutiny to jurisdictional issues. It has recently pursued misconduct on regulated platforms: former U.S. Representative George Santos agreed to return $17,569.98 in trading gains, pay a $17,500 penalty, and accept a three-year trading ban over Kalshi contracts. For crypto and prediction-market operators, the August guidance is a clear compliance signal: platforms may need to revisit how they display contract prices and promote sports-related products to avoid being treated as sportsbooks. Pending appeals in Utah, New York and other jurisdictions will be pivotal in determining whether CFTC registration can shield prediction markets from state gambling laws — and what those markets will be allowed to look and sound like going forward.
CFTC Warns Prediction Markets to Avoid Sportsbook-Style Odds Amid Regulatory Disputes
ChainGPTShare
Summary
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has issued a regulatory policy warning to prediction markets, urging them to avoid sportsbook-style odds to prevent confusion with gambling platforms. As states push to enforce gambling laws on event contracts, regulatory uncertainty grows. The CFTC stressed that these contracts fall under derivatives laws and must not mislead users. New York recently sued Kalshi over alleged unlicensed operations, while 44 states have called for rule changes. Courts remain split on jurisdiction, and the CFTC has already penalized figures like George Santos for misuse of its platform.
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.