Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Disputes Claims of Sacrificing Scalability for Governance

icon币界网
Share
Share IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconShare IconCopy
AI summary iconSummary

expand icon
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson denied claims that the project has prioritized decentralized governance over scalability. He noted that scalability has been central from the beginning, with ongoing research into layer-2, zero-knowledge, and eUTXO models predating Shelley. Hoskinson emphasized that the Voltaire system enables community-driven development and funding without compromising performance. He stressed that Cardano’s Proof of Stake (PoS) design supports both secure consensus and long-term growth.
CoinDesk reports:

Charles Hoskinson, founder and CEO of Input Output Global, refuted the claim that Cardano sacrificed scalability for governance.

In a statement regarding X, he reaffirmed that scaling has always been a core priority, noting that:Cardano's progress on this initiative requires a research-driven approach.

Key points

  • Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson refuted claims that Cardano has sacrificed scalability for governance, emphasizing that scalability remains a core priority.
  • He emphasized that scaling requires thorough research, not speed, and added that this work began well before the Shelley era in 2020.
  • He explained that the Voltaire governance system was introduced to scale up research and thereby enhance the community's capabilities.
  • Hoskinson believes Cardano currently has the best scaling strategy in the cryptocurrency industry.

Cardano will continue to focus on scaling in the long term.

Charles Hoskinson refuted the claim that Cardano has been marginalized, emphasizing that scalability issues in governance were never the primary concern—development work on scalability had already begun long before the Shelley era and has continued ever since.

He pointed out from the outset that the project has invested heavily in foundational research papers and ongoing scientific work to address the network's scalability challenges.

Therefore, Cardano has explored multiple technological pathways, including layer-two solutions, zero-knowledge technologies, and the extended UTXO (eUTXO) accounting model, all aimed at enhancing performance and flexibility.

Scaling requires research, not speed.

It is worth noting that Hoskinson emphasized that scalability cannot be rushed. He believes that, unlike traditional software development, blockchain scaling requires in-depth research.

He also dismissed the notion that increasing the number of developers would accelerate scaling. Instead, he argued that scientific challenges require time, not large-scale staffing.

He also emphasized that no resources have been diverted toward scaling efforts. According to him, dozens of engineers and scientists have been working for years on researching scaling solutions, continuously testing and improving new approaches.

Therefore, he claims that Cardano currently has the best scaling strategy in the industry. He pointed out that ongoing projects such as Leios and Peras are key components of this long-term development roadmap. Last year, Hoskinsonannounced the adoption of a 24/7 development model for Leios, with the protocol expected to launch later this year.

Voltaire strengthened governance during its scaling development.

As expansion efforts continue, Hoskinson noted that Cardano introduced the Voltaire governance system. He clarified that this is not an abandonment of scalability, but rather a complementary measure to strengthen the network.

Through Voltaire, Cardano unlocked its treasury, enabling decentralized development and funding, allowing the community to participate in governance decisions.

In addition, he emphasized that the system enables community participation in shaping the network’s direction, including decisions on upgrades and ecosystem priorities. As a result, governance has become an integral part of Cardano’s development process, rather than a standalone initiative.

Hoskinson further noted that prioritizing scale over governance weakens the ecosystem. He argued that this approach deprives the community of voting rights and centralized decision-making, preventing users from influencing system upgrades or fund allocation.

He also noted that the treasury holds over 1 billion ADA and emphasized that governance ensures these resources remain under community control.

Compare the Cardano governance model with Bitcoin's

In addition, Hoskinson contrasted Cardano’s governance structure with ongoing debates, including discussions around proposals such as BIP-360 and BIP-361.

He believes that Bitcoin's governance challenges highlight the risks of limitations in decision-making frameworks. In contrast, he maintains that Cardano's model reduces fragmentation by ensuring structured, community-driven coordination.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.