Bonk Guy Denies Controlling Majority of EMBER Supply Amid Address Cluster Controversy

icon MarsBit
Share
AI summary iconSummary
On-chain news broke on September 13 when Bonk Guy denied controlling a majority of the EMBER supply. The claim followed a Bubblemaps cluster map indicating that over 50% of tokens were linked to a single cluster. Bonk Guy clarified that the cluster arises from EMBER’s flywheel mechanism, which utilizes external ownership accounts. He stated that the addresses belong to regular users, not insiders. Bubblemaps suggested replacing the EOA with a smart contract to prevent misinterpretation. Crypto news outlets such as MarsBit reported on this response.

Huo Xing Cai Jing reports that on September 13, renowned trader Bonk Guy (@theunipcs) responded to the controversy sparked by his purchase of EMBER. The central point of contention was a Bubblemaps cluster diagram widely circulated in the market, which some users interpreted as indicating that over 50% of EMBER’s supply was linked to a single address cluster, with others implying a connection between this cluster and Bonk Guy himself, thereby questioning his motives for buying EMBER. In response, Bonk Guy explained that EMBER does not have any internal bundling or internal cluster controlling more than 50% of the supply. The address associations shown in the diagram arise because EMBER’s flywheel mechanism distributes tokens via external owned accounts (EOAs), not through smart contracts; since this EOA transfers tokens to multiple users’ wallets participating in the mechanism, Bubblemaps groups all recipient addresses into the same linked network. He emphasized that the flywheel mechanism is one of EMBER’s key distinguishing features compared to other token issuance platforms, and that the addresses receiving tokens in the diagram belong to ordinary users, not insiders. Bubblemaps has also recommended that the project replace this EOA with a smart contract. Bonk Guy expressed his hope that EMBER’s developers will adopt this suggestion and again denied any connection between himself and the so-called internal cluster.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.