Banks Compete for Deposits as Funding Source

iconCoinpaper
Share
AI summary iconSummary
Project funding news shows banks increasingly rely on customer deposits for loans and investments. Federal Reserve news notes deposits are often cheaper than wholesale borrowing. Rising interest rates have intensified competition, with some banks raising rates to keep customers. Losing deposits raises liquidity risk, pushing banks to explore stablecoins and tokenized deposits for funding stability.

To a customer, a bank deposit is money sitting in a checking or savings account.

To a bank, it is something much more valuable: funding.

Deposits are one of the main sources of money banks use to finance loans and investments. The Federal Reserve says deposits are the primary funding source at most banks, alongside alternatives such as Federal Home Loan Bank advances and wholesale borrowing.

That is why banks can become surprisingly aggressive about attracting your cash.

In the Federal Reserve’s latest regional survey, banks across multiple districts said competition for deposits remained strong, with some institutions keeping deposit rates elevated to stop customers from moving their money elsewhere.

Deposits help banks fund loans and investments.

Deposits Are Cheaper Than Many Other Sources of Funding

Banks need money before they can make many of the loans sitting on the asset side of their balance sheets.

Imagine a bank receives $10,000 in customer deposits.

It may pay the customer 3% interest, then use its broader funding pool to support mortgages, business loans or securities that earn more than 3%.

The difference between what a bank earns on assets and what it pays for funding is central to its profitability.

That is why cheap deposits are valuable.

A customer leaving $20,000 in a checking account paying almost nothing can represent very inexpensive funding. A bank forced to offer 4% to keep that same money faces a much higher cost.

The Federal Reserve explicitly warns that banks can attract deposits quickly by offering above-market rates, but doing so can substantially increase funding costs and attract customers who are especially likely to leave when another institution offers more.

This is also why banks do not automatically raise savings rates every time the Federal Reserve moves rates.

They generally want to pay enough to retain deposits without unnecessarily giving away margin.

Funding sourceTypical characteristic
Checking depositsOften relatively low cost
Savings depositsMore rate-sensitive
CDs / time depositsHigher rate, more predictable maturity
Wholesale borrowingMarket-priced and often more expensive
Central-bank borrowingPrimarily a liquidity backstop

Why Deposits Become More Valuable When Rates Rise

Deposit competition usually intensifies when customers have better alternatives.

As of early September 2026, the effective federal funds rate is about 3.63%, while short-term money-market instruments offer yields in a similar range.

That gives customers an incentive to ask why their bank account might be paying much less.

Money can move into money-market funds, Treasury bills, higher-yield savings accounts or rival banks.

This forces banks to decide whether losing the deposit is more expensive than paying a higher rate to keep it.

Our explainer on stablecoin reserves illustrates the same broader economics: whoever controls a large pool of cash can earn substantial income by placing it in interest-bearing assets.

Banks now face competition from digital money as well. Banking groups have warned that yield-bearing stablecoins could draw funds away from traditional accounts and raise bank funding costs, although crypto companies dispute how large that threat actually is. The disagreement has become part of the broader stablecoin deposit debate.

Why Losing Deposits Can Become a Bigger Problem

Deposits are not just about profit.

They also matter for liquidity.

Banks must be able to meet withdrawals even though much of their balance sheet may consist of loans and securities that cannot instantly be converted into cash without potentially taking losses.

Stable deposits therefore provide a relatively dependable funding base.

The Fed notes that deposit outflows can significantly increase liquidity risk, while stable deposits can help banks withstand periods of stress.

That became painfully clear during previous bank runs, when customers moved money much faster than institutions could comfortably replace it.

If deposits leave, a bank may need to replace them with more expensive wholesale borrowing, sell assets, reduce lending or raise additional capital.

The issue becomes even more important as money moves faster.

Banks are developing their own stablecoins and tokenized deposits partly because they do not want payment innovation to separate customers from the deposits that fund their businesses.

The simple reason banks compete for deposits is therefore not that they merely want larger account balances.

Deposits are raw material for banking.

They help fund loans, provide liquidity and can be cheaper than borrowing money elsewhere.

That is why a seemingly small difference in the interest rate on your savings account can matter enormously to a bank managing billions of dollars.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.