Odaily Planet Daily report: BIP-110 has sparked community controversy due to its attempt to restrict non-financial data storage on the Bitcoin blockchain. Supporters of the proposal plan to push for the rule change via a User-Activated Soft Fork (UASF), but current miner support is far below the threshold required for activation. The market is watching to see whether this dispute will further escalate into a governance split within the Bitcoin network.
Blockstream CEO Adam Back posted on X, criticizing the arguments of BIP-110 supporters, stating that the claim that "Bitcoin supports spam" is incorrect and that all Bitcoin participants dislike network spam. Adam Back noted that Bitcoin cannot achieve absolute censorship at a mathematical level, and that the BIP-110 proposal itself has numerous flaws and cannot function effectively, thus lacking network consensus. He emphasized that forcibly implementing rule changes without consensus could ultimately lead to a fork similar to Bitcoin SV (BSV).