MY BROTHER WAS 12. BY THE TIME THE COURT WAS READY, IT WAS A DIFFERENT CASE. A white Benz, driven by Kenneth under the influence, swerved into the opposing lane. My brother survived, but lost his right leg. The first hearing came 3 months later. Kenneth attended. The next was adjourned because my brother could not attend. Before that date, Kenneth died from his injuries. Then another delay: my brother needed care, while Kenneth's family needed to bury him according to their faith. The court wanted an autopsy first. Albert Castellana's point on Unchained hit me. On @GenLayer: • First answer: ~5 minutes, under $1. • Appeal window: ~30 minutes. • Full appeal path: ~3 hours, up to $100. GenLayer uses independent AI validators, with larger panels when challenged. It is getting a decision while the PEOPLE, FACTS and CIRCUMSTANCES still belong to the dispute. My brother's case could have had an answer in minutes, not months. Speed could not restore his leg, but it could have kept the dispute closer to the event. If your last dispute got a first answer in 30 minutes, what would still be different? Give me the number of days yours took. I want real stories, not theory at all.