This perspective is truly unique. Studying Primus shouldn’t just focus on technology and airdrops—it’s equally important to assess whether the product can generate sustained demand for $PRIM. @primus_labs The project’s distinctiveness is clear: zkTLS + FHE for data verification and privacy-preserving computation, without building a new chain, but instead acting as a plug-in layer integrated directly into existing ecosystems. It’s already powering real-time PoR (covering on-chain and off-chain reserves) for Unitas, and advancing Confidential Finance, while exploring private transfers and yield with Unitas and United Stables. But as the tweet mentions, the key questions ahead are: ▪ Must service calls and node participation use $PRIM? ▪ Is there a clear mechanism for capturing protocol revenue? If usage grows but token demand doesn’t follow, the product and token will remain decoupled. ▪ The token unlock schedule on the supply side must also be closely monitored—too rapid incentive releases can create persistent selling pressure. For me, the airdrop only determines how much you initially receive; what truly matters to track over time is whether the token becomes more valuable as more people use the network. In short, all this is just talk—ultimately, it all comes down to the official tokenomics model and real-world performance. 😃