Successful stablecoin-like products historically solved for a major problem, and giving yield to users wasn’t it. Tether: shortage of USD on blockchains and emerging markets Feng Piao Notes: shortage of local currency in 1920s Manchuria UK Private Coinage: shortage of small-denomination GBP Wildcat Banknotes: shortage of currency in US hinterlands and frontiers Swedish Banknotes: shortage of SEK currency You’ll notice that all of these tackled a common problem that led to their adoption - a shortage of currency and local liquidity. This is why I’m so bullish on stablecoins as a category but bearish on nearly all products that label themselves as stablecoins. Most “stablecoins” are either competing on yield (e.g. USDS) which doesn’t build transactional adoption (and thus that Holy Grail of monetary premium), or are competing in developed markets already awash in liquidity (e.g. PYUSD, USDC).

Share







Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.
