The 3% bonus is the part everyone will talk about. The part I'd actually check is what the payout looks like when nobody's launching. That's the tension inside @RebateLaunch. The bonus is clean. Rate shows before you confirm, lands in the same transaction, you're ahead from the first second instead of behind the spread like every other pad. No trust needed, you can verify it yourself. The payout is a different claim. USDG to holders several times a day, nothing staked, nothing claimed. Fixed supply, no minting. Which means it isn't a rate at all. It's a split of whatever the pad earned that day, divided among whoever's holding. So here's what I'd want to see before depositing anything. Does the interface show a trailing payout average, or only the current one? If it only shows today's number, then the yield you're looking at depends on the volume of people arriving after you. Same question applies to the burn. Every launch generates fees that buy and burn Rebate. That works while launches keep coming. The design doesn't fail in a busy week. It fails silently in a quiet one. None of that makes it a bad product. It makes it one where the first question should be "what funds this," not "how much does it pay." The launch I'd run: something dull with actual revenue, paired to USDG. Then come back in week three once the launch crowd has moved on and see whether the payout still clears. Top 20 creators split 2,000 USDT, 21-100 share a 1% airdrop. @Starlisting partnership means posts score on both boards. @RebateLaunch.