This comparison is absolutely ridiculous. 🤣 The 3% figure is NOT a valid measure of $HOOKR’s fee capture. It’s misleading at best, and the underlying calculation hasn’t even been verified. You’re comparing three completely different metrics and pretending they measure the same thing. Let’s make something clear: $HOOKR IS FINANCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE. $TORCH IS A LAUNCHPAD/TOKEN-TAX MODEL. Anyone can build a launchpad on existing infrastructure. Hookr is building the infrastructure that allows developers to create entirely new, composable financial markets. Multichain Uniswap v4 hooks, launch protection, programmable liquidity, AI-agent markets, Revenue Tokens and automated fee distribution. HOOKR EARNS THROUGH MULTIPLE ECONOMIC MECHANISMS: → Arbitrage recapture → Hook Block fees → Protocol minimum fees → Eligible launch-pool LP fees → Tax and conversion mechanisms Its economic activity extends far beyond trades routed through official HOOKR pools. Meanwhile, 100% of sampled buys paying a token tax doesn’t prove superior revenue generation. And if $TORCH has concentrated team-controlled supply, that deserves transparent onchain scrutiny rather than being ignored. A TOKEN TAX IS NOT THE SAME AS AN INFRASTRUCTURE REVENUE MODEL. One monetizes activity around a token. The other enables entire ecosystems to build programmable markets and generate fees. The 3% statistic doesn’t capture that distinction, and without transparent methodology it shouldn’t be presented as fact. STOP COMPARING A SINGLE LAUNCHPAD TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT LAUNCHPADS CAN BUILD ON. 🪝🔥