After reading Sun Ge’s comprehensive analysis of this WLFI governance proposal, I believe the core issue has transcended a simple project disagreement—it represents a fundamental clash over Web3 values. Many focus only on “locking, voting, burning,” but fail to grasp the extreme centralization embedded in this rule design: Opposing the proposal results in permanent locking; dissenters have their voting rights preemptively frozen; ultimate control rests with completely anonymous multisig and guardian addresses; ordinary participants must undergo KYC to vote, while those wielding life-or-death power remain hidden behind the scenes. This is not DAO governance—it is a scripted vote with a predetermined outcome. True decentralization has never meant “whatever the team says goes.” It means transparent rules, verifiable power, protected rights to dissent, and protection of minority interests from majority tyranny. Yet WLFI disguises coercion as “long-term alignment,” frames asset deprivation as “ecosystem commitment,” and sacrifices the interests of billions in user holdings to consolidate power—completely betraying the spirit of freedom originally championed by World Liberty Financial. Sun Ge has pinpointed critical issues that are both sharp and fully verifiable: Contract backdoors with blacklists, anonymous controllers overriding governance, selective revocation of voting rights, and a bullying mechanism that punishes opposition. This is not a technical issue—it is the complete collapse of governance ethics. I firmly support Sun Ge in defending investors’ legitimate property rights, and I urge all WLFI holders to recognize the truth: Free finance must not be a façade for tyranny, and on-chain governance must not become a tool for dictators. Web3 demands transparent, fair, and verifiable distribution of power—not shadowy manipulation by anonymous actors. Stand firm on the principle of decentralization. Support justice. Reject pseudo-DAOs. @justinsuntron @trondao @TronDao_THA #TRON #TRONGlobalFriends