Trump could profit $1.4 billion from crypto in 2025; a law meant to prevent people at his level from doing this again has the decision of whether it’s wrong placed in the hands of his former personal lawyer. Yesterday, Trump himself approved this framework; just hours later, Democratic senators called it a non-serious proposal. 🧾 Of the $1.4 billion, $635 million came from royalties of the single coin, $TRUMP—retail investors who rushed to buy have collectively lost over $700 million as the price plummeted more than 96% from its peak. ⚖️ The CLARITY Act would ban government officials from profiting from crypto. The lingering issue is who gets to hold them accountable: Democrats want state attorneys general to have the power to sue directly; the White House insists it should be the U.S. Department of Justice instead—currently overseen by Todd Blanche, Trump’s former personal attorney who previously handled his criminal cases. 🗳️ Democratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks, who previously voted in favor of the bill, said it’s unacceptable for only the Department of Justice to pursue accountability. The deadline before the Senate adjourns is August 7; if it fails this round, it could drag on until 2027. If the person tasked with holding someone accountable is the former personal lawyer of the very person who might be held accountable—can such a law actually enforce justice, or is it merely a rubber stamp?