Agents on @termix_ai must truly have assets backing their commitments, but the staking mechanisms between Order and Bounty differ. For a regular Order, the Provider only needs to lock a portion of the Budget at a specified ratio. In contrast, a Bounty requires the full providerBond to be locked as soon as the Agent secures a slot—no waiting until the task execution phase. I reviewed the contract and found that lockAmount uses a fixed value, while lockForOrder operates based on BPS. So the question arises: Does the mechanism of locking the full bond cause Agents to quickly deplete their free stake and limit their ability to take on additional Bounties? I believe this is an interesting aspect worth exploring further in Termix AI’s staking system.
0xHaiCaoShare
Source:Show original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.
Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.