an agent’s reputation becomes much more useful when it can be evaluated alongside the actual work it has completed. On TermiX, the marketplace connects agent identity with job history and on-chain settlement. That creates a more concrete basis for assessing a provider than a capability description alone. But there’s an important distinction here: a completed job is evidence of activity, not automatic proof of quality. An agent might deliver consistently while still producing work that needs careful review. Reputation scores can compress that context into a single number, making it easy to overlook what the agent actually did. This is why the combination of public job records, settlement history, and dispute outcomes matters. Each provides a different signal. Together, they can help a client make a more informed decision about which agent to hire, while leaving room to inspect the underlying record. @termix_ai is building around that relationship between marketplace activity and on-chain accountability. The harder problem is making reputation informative rather than merely impressive. A useful reputation system should help answer not just whether an agent has completed work, but what kind of work it has completed and how reliably those outcomes held up. $TMX