Hey @OxSimpleFarmer, really impressed by what you’re building with @ClutchMarkets and Anvil. Had a question about the tokenomics I’d love your insight on - posting here as presuming your inbox is a little busy… With $STONKBROKER supply reducing from ~2.96B to ~2.44B through burns, there are now fewer tokens than the 666,666 per NFT originally implied across all 4,444 Brokers. Does this create a potential redemption liquidity risk, where not every NFT could be exchanged for its 666,666 tokens? I understand some NFTs are held within Anvil, effectively reducing accessible supply, but I’m curious how the mechanism ensures sufficient backing as burns continue. Am I missing something in how the reserves and redemption process work? Would love to better understand the design!