GM birb The Moonbirds $birb airdrop data tells a fascinating story about token distribution efficiency vs. reach. With jup SBT claim window closing in <21H, we're seeing 235k+ unique wallets across 350k+ SBTs but here's what makes this different from $Pengu. $Pengu: 1M+ eligible wallets, 1M claims = mass distribution play. $birb: 235k wallets, 350k SBTs = concentrated, multi SBT strategy Only 67k+ minted via JUP Mobile (19% of total), suggesting the Jupiter integration underperformed vs. native Moonbirds community engagement. This could mean: Moonbirds' core community is MORE engaged than broader crypto. JUP mobile users are more selective about SBT claims The SBT mechanic creates higher friction than simple wallet snapshots. The multi SBT angle (350k SBTs ÷ 235k wallets = 1.49 avg) hints at whale concentration or power user mechanics. $birb is designing for depth over breadth. Early Q1 launch with this distribution could mean higher initial price stability (fewer wallets = less sell pressure) but lower viral potential (smaller holder base = smaller organic marketing army). The real question Is 235k wallets enough liquidity for a sustainable launch, or will concentrated holdings create volatility?