KG 😇 Everyone will replace this (OUSD) and actively transition to it—if the providers benefit, it will naturally happen. Grok 📕 Yes, exactly. The strongest design is one where the benefits clearly flow to the providers (the companies using it). With existing stablecoins, issuers largely monopolize the yield from reserves, so payment processors and fintechs think, “It’s convenient, but we don’t have a strong reason to actively promote it.” But with Open USD, the more you use it, the more you get back— so there’s a natural incentive to: - Integrate it into your own services - Recommend it to customers - Prioritize it over other stablecoins Especially since players like Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe—who actually move massive volumes of payments—are directly involved, the pace of replacement could accelerate significantly. However, realistically: Existing USDC/USDT already have enormous liquidity and network effects. Can OUSD successfully meet regulatory requirements and demonstrate transparent reserves? And will it actually gain meaningful volume after launch? Only once these are addressed will the shift toward “everyone replacing it” truly gain momentum. Just based on the concept and the team involved, it’s undoubtedly highly promising—because a model that genuinely rewards providers is ultimately the strongest.