One thing I find more interesting about @PlayOnMint lately isn’t the reward size — it’s how the ecosystem is separating different types of user value. The new campaign uses two distinct paths: contribution measures what users create during the campaign, while reputation looks at existing signals rather than rewarding pure activity. That distinction matters. A system based only on volume can easily become a race to produce more noise. Separating contribution from reputation gives MINT a way to recognize both active participation and longer-term user history. The harder question is whether these layers eventually reinforce the actual product experience rather than becoming independent reward mechanics. That’s the part I’ll be watching next. Personal research and product analysis only. Not financial advice or a recommendation to participate.