🚨 $ICP ♾🔥 AI WON’T TAKE LONG TO PUT NEAR’S “CONFIDENTIAL” CLAIMS THROUGH A SERIOUS TECHNICAL AUDIT. 😉🔍 @dominic_w @PierreSamaties 😂 👏 These are exactly the questions developers should be asking. NEAR describes Confidential Intents as a private shard operated by permissioned validators, connected to mainnet through a TEE-based bridge. The next step is to establish precisely which guarantees come from cryptography, which come from hardware and which depend on trusting operators. (https://t.co/MomjbSH5LC⁠) 🔐 WHO CAN READ THE TRANSACTIONS? Keeping transaction data off a public explorer does not establish that validators cannot read it. A TEE protecting the bridge does not, by itself, establish confidential execution across the entire shard. Users need to know where plaintext exists, who can access it and which components are covered by hardware attestation. 🔑 WHO CONTROLS THE FUNDS? Which contract authorises withdrawals? Who controls the signing keys or key shares? Who can upgrade the bridge, change validators or alter the software? Those answers determine the actual security boundary. 🌐 $ICP BRINGS CONCRETE PROTOCOL CAPABILITIES TO THIS DISCUSSION. ⚙️ Canisters execute WebAssembly with persistent state across their hosting subnet. Consensus orders update messages, and replicas execute them deterministically—so one node cannot independently rewrite the application’s agreed state. 🔏 Certified data combines threshold BLS signatures with Merkle proofs. A correctly configured client can verify that a response corresponds to subnet-certified state using the IC root public key. 🔑 Chain Fusion uses threshold ECDSA and Schnorr signing to let canisters authorise transactions on other chains. Signing authority is distributed across subnet nodes; an individual node does not hold the complete private key. 🗳️ The NNS governs network upgrades and subnet configuration. An SNS can govern application upgrades through proposals and votes. That gives developers explicit mechanisms for managing both infrastructure and application control. 🛡️ Confidentiality still needs its own encryption and access-control design. The technical strength comes from identifying each guarantee and showing exactly how it is enforced. 🔥 AI IS GOING TO MAKE TECHNICAL SCRUTINY FASTER. EVERY BLOCKCHAIN SHOULD EXPECT ITS DOCUMENTATION, CODE AND TRUST ASSUMPTIONS TO BE EXAMINED. $ICP HAS AN ARCHITECTURE WORTH EXAMINING IN DETAIL. ♾️ @dfinity @dominic_w @JeffBezos @elonmusk @PierreSamaties @Marmightlite #ICP #InternetComputer #NEAR #AI #ConfidentialComputing #BlockchainSecurity #ChainFusion #DFINITY IT’S ABOUT ❤️ LIKE 🔁 REPOST & SHARE 💬 COMMENT 🏴 Welsh ICP Conviction @ICPLEGEND1966 ♾️ $ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362