source avatarCA Nitin Kaushik (FCA) | LLB

Share

A supplier’s GST registration gets cancelled. Years later, the buyer is told: Your purchase was bogus. But the Delhi ITAT recently said: Not so fast. In ACIT v. Bonlon Industries, the disputed purchases were worth ₹73.32 crore. The tax officer had made a ₹9.16 crore addition, alleging the purchases were bogus. But Bonlon had invoices, GST records, e way documents, bank payments, stock records, supplier confirmations and sales records. And there was another important point: The corresponding sales were accepted. The books weren’t rejected. So the Tribunal found that simply treating the purchases as bogus and applying an ad-hoc 12.5% addition wasn’t justified. The lesson for businesses is simple: A supplier’s later GST problems don’t automatically make your genuine transaction fake. But that doesn’t mean vendor due diligence is optional. If you’re claiming a genuine purchase, keep the evidence trail. #GST #IncomeTax #TaxCompliance #BusinessFinance

Disclaimer: The information on this page may have been obtained from third parties and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of KuCoin. This content is provided for general informational purposes only, without any representation or warranty of any kind, nor shall it be construed as financial or investment advice. KuCoin shall not be liable for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Investments in digital assets can be risky. Please carefully evaluate the risks of a product and your risk tolerance based on your own financial circumstances. For more information, please refer to our Terms of Use and Risk Disclosure.